The cost of Harris-Bidens migrant flood, Kams plans slam economy, working class flees dems and other commentary

“What the citizens of Springfield and Aurora are experiencing” are “the real costs of an historically unprecedented flood of migrants into the country,” fumes the Washington Examiner’s editorial board. “From day one, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have” flagrantly abused “statutes to create dubious new pathways for otherwise illegal immigrants to enter and stay in the country.” In “Springfield, a town of 60,000,” estimates “suggest 12,000 to 20,000 Haitians have recently been deposited without the existing community’s approval or consent.” Many have “been granted Temporary Protected Status by Biden, giving them a legal status, but that does not mean they arrived legally.” If Harris “does win this fall, voters should expect much more pain like what is occurring in Springfield and Aurora [Colo.] and in many more communities.”“Almost nothing could be more important to the future of American workers than access to affordable energy,” frets Liz Peek at The Hill, yet the dictates of White House climate zealots “will lead to soaring electricity costs” and cripple the “country’s ability to compete in the industries of the future,” i.e., “artificial intelligence.” The renewable-energy drive has already brought “rising electricity costs,” and the needs of AI data centers soon will be “roughly equivalent to the electricity consumption of Japan.” “Cheap electricity is essential” to the nation’s industrial future.“Abundant cheap fossil fuels” have kept prices low and given the US a “competitive edge.” “Kamala Harris could eliminate that advantage, by pursuing high-cost renewable energy and making it even harder to produce U.S.

oil and gas.”The Teamsters’ decision not to endorse a presidential candidate, for the first time since 1996, “stung” the Kamala Harris campaign, reports Michael Baharaeen at UnHerd.“It’s the latest sign of the Democratic Party’s struggles ...