How Google Spent 15 Years Concealing Its Internal Conversations

In late 2008, as Google faced antitrust scrutiny over an advertising deal with its rival Yahoo and confronted lawsuits involving patent, trademark and copyright claims, its executives sent out a confidential memo.“We believe that information is good,” the executives told employees in the memo.But, they added, government regulators or competitors might seize on words that Google workers casually, thoughtlessly wrote to one another.To minimize the odds that a lawsuit could flush out comments that might be incriminating, Google said, employees should refrain from speculation and sarcasm and “think twice” before writing one another about “hot topics.” “Don’t comment before you have all the facts,” they were instructed.The technology was tweaked, too.

The setting for the company’s instant messaging tool was changed to “off the record.” An incautious phrase would be wiped the next day.The memo became the first salvo in a 15-year campaign by Google to make deletion the default in its internal communications.Even as the internet giant stored the world’s information, it created an office culture that tried to minimize its own.

Among its tools: using legal privilege as an all-purpose shield and imposing restraints on its own technology, all while continually warning that loose lips could sink even the most successful corporation.How Google developed this distrustful culture was pieced together from hundreds of documents and exhibits, as well as witness testimony, in three antitrust trials against the Silicon Valley company over the last year.The plaintiffs — Epic Games in one case, the Department of Justice in the other two — were trying to establish monopoly behavior, which required them to look through emails, memos and instant messages from hundreds of Google engineers and executives.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

If y...

Read More 
PaprClips
Disclaimer: This story is auto-aggregated by a computer program and has not been created or edited by PaprClips.
Publisher: The New York Times

Recent Articles