Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs popular in corporate America and at US colleges that are meant to tackle discrimination might instead actually foment hostility and racial tensions, according to a new study.Research by the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) and Rutgers University’s Social Perception Lab found that certain DEI practices pushed on participants led some of them to become irrationally confrontational and antagonistic.
“The evidence presented in these studies reveals that while purporting to combat bias, some anti-oppressive DEI narratives can engender a hostile attribution bias and heighten racial suspicion, prejudicial attitudes, authoritarian policing, and support for punitive behaviors in the absence of evidence for a transgression deserving punishment,” the study released Monday argues.Study co-author and NCRI Chief Science Officer Joel Finkelstein told Fox News researchers took ideas that are prominent in DEI lectures and training, and explored how exposing people to that ideology would affect them.Texts from controversial anti-racist authors Ibram X.Kendi and Robin DiAngelo were included in the study, including themes that claim white supremacy and racism are a norm rather than the exception.Participants that read the anti-racist material developed a “hostile attribution bias” and were more likely to believe in punitive measures for offenders of so-called microaggressions even without evidence, according to Fox News.
“And when people are supposed to see anti-racist material in the ideology, it looks like what happens is that they become more likely to punish for any evidence of wrongdoing,” Finkelstein told the outlet.“That includes protesting people, calling for dismissal, demanding public apologies, receiving people calling for their relocation.These punitive measures are, in some cases, costing people their jobs.”The NCRI also found that anti-Islamophobia material that comes from a Muslim advocacy group ma...