I admire Mitt Romney.He is, by all accounts, an outstanding husband and father.
He built a successful investment firm by supporting successful young businesses like Staples.He served the public as head of the 2002 Winter Olympics and as a governor.
As a senator, he had the courage to vote to convict Donald Trump twice, in the two separate impeachment trials, when few other Republicans did.But as Noah Millman writes on Substack, people in the MAGA movement take a different view of Romney.In private life, Romney compliantly conformed to the bourgeois norms of those around him.
In business he contributed to the bloating of the finance and consulting sector.As a politician he bent himself to the needs of the moment, moving from moderate Republican to “extreme conservative.” As a senator, he sought the approval of the Washington establishment.Millman’s underlying point is it’s not sufficient to say that Trump is leading a band of morally challenged people to power.
It’s that Trumpism represents an alternative value system.The people I regard as upright and admirable MAGA regards as morally disgraceful, and the people I regard as corrupt and selfish MAGA regards as heroic.The crucial distinction is that some of us have an institutional mind-set while the MAGA mind-set is anti-institutional.In the former view, we are born into a world of institutions — families, schools, professions, the structures of our government.
We are formed by these institutions.People develop good character as they live up to the standards of excellence passed down in their institutions — by displaying the civic virtues required by our Constitution, by living up to what it means to be a good teacher or nurse or, if they are Christians, by imitating the self-emptying love of Christ.
Over the course of our lives, we inherit institutions, steward them and try to pass them along in better shape to the next generation.We know our institutions have flaws and need reform, but we regar...