The Courts deportation lunacy, progs are losing but wont quitand other commentary

“The Supreme Court says illegal aliens” deserve due process “before they are spirited away to their countries of origin,” and “liberal activists are celebrating a fundamental right,” grumbles the Washington Times’ editorial board.But liberals’ goals seem more about “perpetuating lawlessness at the border” than justice.Meanwhile, a federal judge ruled “President Trump couldn’t reverse President Biden’s unilateral decision” to “parole” over 500,000 illegal immigrants “from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela” into the US.The judge insists “that what Mr.Biden accomplished with a stroke of his autopen can’t be undone by Mr.

Trump without ‘case-by-case review’ ” — which “would take 350 years” to complete.Yet the law that lets the administration set parole policy “is unambiguous.” The Supreme Court must “apply common sense and curb these judicial interventions.” “After spikes in homicides and other offenses, which sparked fears of a return to the bloody New York of the 1990s, major crime in New York City has headed toward historic lows,” reports Rafael A.

Mangual at The New York Times.The failed “progressive policy experiment that kept criminals out of prison and jail” has been replaced “with increased enforcement, concentrated in areas of New York City with the most crime.”But progressives still “push to abolish gang databases,” limit “gunshot detection technology” and refuse “modest” tweaks to “the state’s 2019 discovery changes.”Some seem “more concerned about criminals” than victims.Like the left and right in the 1980s and ’90s, we need to reach a “consensus on crime control” before things go bad. Team Trump “has demonstrated a dogged devotion to dismantling and destroying” the “censorship-industrial complex,” notes Ben Weingarten at The Federalist.Next up? The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which served as “ ‘nerve center’ of ...